食品伙伴網(wǎng)報(bào)道，據(jù)美國(guó)食品安全新聞網(wǎng)8月11日消息，在美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)大規(guī)?；謴?fù)被原油泄漏所影響的墨西哥灣漁業(yè)的同時(shí)，美國(guó)衛(wèi)生與公共服務(wù)部部長(zhǎng)授意醫(yī)學(xué)研究所召開(kāi)一個(gè)研討會(huì)，對(duì)墨西哥灣原油泄漏對(duì)健康的影響進(jìn)行了研究討論。本周，該研究所發(fā)布了一份研討的摘要，其中強(qiáng)調(diào)了原油泄漏對(duì)健康潛在影響的復(fù)雜性，以及仍需要更多的研究及相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)才能得到結(jié)論。
英國(guó)石油公司在墨西哥灣的原油泄漏將如何影響人體健康？答案很簡(jiǎn)單：我們也不知道。受命負(fù)責(zé)針對(duì)此問(wèn)題進(jìn)行調(diào)查的醫(yī)學(xué)研究所稱(chēng)：墨西哥灣原油泄漏是史無(wú)前例的，從泄漏點(diǎn)向環(huán)境中泄露的原油的量，泄露所持續(xù)的時(shí)間，以及自然界的動(dòng)態(tài)變化，這些因素都使墨西哥灣原油泄漏對(duì)人體健康影響的研究具有挑戰(zhàn)性。
在進(jìn)行了一周的會(huì)議通知之后，今年6月，37名專(zhuān)家及一些公共衛(wèi)生官員等300多人，在新奧爾良市參加了本次研討會(huì)。與會(huì)者就該如何衡量及減輕原油泄漏對(duì)公共健康的影響進(jìn)行了討論。根據(jù)該簡(jiǎn)報(bào)，與會(huì)專(zhuān)家的討論涉及的主題范圍之廣泛，從生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的水質(zhì)到高危人群，但是每個(gè)議題都有一個(gè)共同之處：科學(xué)家無(wú)法對(duì)全方位的健康影響做出預(yù)測(cè)。
報(bào)告稱(chēng)墨西哥灣原油泄漏對(duì)生理、心理、及社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)可能會(huì)造成的潛在的影響。以及在影響區(qū)域內(nèi)，海灣清理對(duì)人體健康的長(zhǎng)期及短期的影響不明，而被影響的人群包括陸地及沿海的負(fù)責(zé)清理原油的工作人員、漁民、其他商業(yè)人員、居民、游客以及整個(gè)社區(qū)。
一位環(huán)境放射學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)的研究人員強(qiáng)調(diào)：食物污染的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)并不一定局限于海鮮，在墨西哥灣地區(qū)，潛在的毒素進(jìn)入食品供應(yīng)是一個(gè)需要考慮的特別問(wèn)題。他建議有必要進(jìn)行廣泛的監(jiān)控。報(bào)告中稱(chēng)，需要通過(guò)收集包括食物、空氣、水質(zhì)等不同的樣品進(jìn)行監(jiān)測(cè)，才能了解在墨西哥灣地區(qū)潛在的毒素是否對(duì)食品供應(yīng)造成影響。并且食品抽樣不僅只限于海鮮檢測(cè)，對(duì)捕魚(yú)捕蝦的裝置器械也應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行監(jiān)控，此外，對(duì)水質(zhì)的調(diào)查也應(yīng)該加強(qiáng)對(duì)當(dāng)?shù)貞?yīng)用水源的監(jiān)控等等。 此外，一位公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)教授對(duì)自然存在的細(xì)菌表示了擔(dān)心，因?yàn)橛蓄?lèi)細(xì)菌能夠吸收分解一些石油化工品，而這些代謝石油的細(xì)菌需要氧氣，若它們要分解大量的原油，則可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致一個(gè)更大的物種死亡（編者注，可能此處指與海藻魚(yú)蝦爭(zhēng)奪更多的氧氣，從而造成了魚(yú)蝦等的死亡），這對(duì)人類(lèi)的健康可能會(huì)造成間接的后果。
該報(bào)告稱(chēng)：這次研討會(huì)僅僅是對(duì)這件事情的長(zhǎng)期的（可能幾十年之久）討論的一個(gè)開(kāi)端，公共衛(wèi)生官員、科學(xué)工作者以及社區(qū)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)，必須有充分的努力來(lái)克服原油泄漏對(duì)健康的影響。
How will the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico impact human health? The short answer: we don't know.
At the direction of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the Institute of Medicine recently held a workshop on the health effects of the Gulf oil spill. This week, the group released a summary of the discussion, which emphasized the complexity of potential health impacts and the need for more data and research.
"The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is unprecedented," according to the Institute. "From the origin of the leak, to the amount of oil released into the environment, to the spill's duration and ongoing nature, the Gulf oil spill poses unique challenges to human health."
With a week's notice, 37 experts and public health officials and over 300 participants gathered in New Orleans for the workshop in June to begin the discussion on how to measure and mitigate the public health impact of the spill.
According to the report, the expert discussion touched on a wide variety of topics, from water quality to ecosystems to at-risk populations, but there was one unifying theme: scientists cannot predict the full range of health consequences.
"The potential physical, psychological, and socioeconomic impacts of the Gulf oil spill and clean-up response on the short- and long-term health of individuals in the affected region--including land- and sea-based clean-up workers, fishermen, and other commercial workers, residents, visitors, and communities as a whole--are unknown," reads the report.
William Farland, a researcher at Colorado State Unviversity in environmental and radiological science, emphasized that food contamination risks were not necessarily limited to seafood. "The potential for toxins to enter the food supply is a particularly important issue to consider in the Gulf," reads the summary of Farland's presentation.
Farland said he believes widespread monitoring will be necessary.
"Understanding the source-to-receptor pathways in the Gulf, including toxicity in the food supply, will require gathering several types of data through various types of monitoring activities, including food, air, and water sampling," said the report.
"Food sampling should involve not just seafood testing but also creel surveys and game monitoring, given that there are local populations of subsistence hunters and fishermen," the report continues. "With respect to water sampling, while it is unlikely that contamination will move far enough inland to affect underground water systems, it is important to ensure that disposal plans for various items (e.g., used personal protective equipment) address the issue of potential contamination of local wells."
Dr. Bernard Goldstein, a professor at University of Pittsburgh's school of public health, discussed naturally existing bacteria being able to ingest and break down some of the oil chemical compounds. "These oil-metabolizing bacteria require oxygen," reads the summary. "An increase in their numbers caused by a large food source could result in an even larger dead zone, which has potentially indirect consequences for human health."
"As elaborated throughout the workshop, there are many unanswered questions about at-risk populations, potential hazards (including exposures) to human health, the potential effects of these hazards, and how best to minimize hazards," says the report.
According to the Institute of Medicine, some of the uncertainty "stems from the enormity and unprecedented magnitude and scope of the disaster."
As the report notes, the workshop was just the beginning of a long, perhaps decades-long, discussion that public health officials, scientists, and community leaders will need to have to fully grapple with the health effects of the spill.
原文地址：http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2010/08/iom-issues-report-on-oil-spill-health-consequences/
